Needed for #12860.
The new live preview pattern requires collection-level preferences, a
pattern that does not yet exist.
Instead of creating a new record for these types of preferences, we can
simply reuse `<collectionSlug>-list` under a more general key:
`collection-<slug>`. This way other relevant properties can be attached
in the future that might not specifically apply to the list view.
This will also match the conventions already estalished by
document-level preferences in `collection-<slug>-<id>` and
`global-<slug>`.
---
- To see the specific tasks where the Asana app for GitHub is being
used, see below:
- https://app.asana.com/0/0/1210628212784050
Currently, we globally enable both DOM and Node.js types. While this
mostly works, it can cause conflicts - particularly with `fetch`. For
example, TypeScript may incorrectly allow browser-only properties (like
`cache`) and reject valid Node.js ones like `dispatcher`.
This PR disables DOM types for server-only packages like payload,
ensuring Node-specific typings are applied. This caught a few instances
of incorrect fetch usage that were previously masked by overlapping DOM
types.
This is not a perfect solution - packages that contain both server and
client code (like richtext-lexical or next) will still suffer from this
issue. However, it's an improvement in cases where we can cleanly
separate server and client types, like for the `payload` package which
is server-only.
## Use-case
This change enables https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12622 to
explore using node-native fetch + `dispatcher`, instead of `node-fetch`
+ `agent`.
Currently, it will incorrectly report that `dispatcher` is not a valid
property for node-native fetch
### What?
The azure storage adapter returns a 500 internal server error when a
file is not found.
It's expected that it will return 404 when a file is not found.
### Why?
There is no checking if the blockBlobClient exists before it's used, so
it throws a RestError when used and the blob does not exist.
### How?
Check if exception thrown is of type RestError and have a 404 error from
the Azure API and return a 404 in that case.
An alternative way would be to call the exists() method on the
blockBlobClient, but that will be one more API call for blobs that does
exist. So I chose to check the exception instead.
Also added integration tests for azure storage in the same manner as s3,
as it was missing for azure storage.
When making an export of a collection, and no fields are selected then
you get am empty CSV. The intended behavior is that all data is exported
by default.
This fixes the issue that from the admin UI, when the fields selector
the resulting CSV has no columns.
This makes it possible to add custom logic into how we map the document
data into the CSV data on a field-by-field basis.
- Allow custom data transformation to be added to
`custom.['plugin-import-export'].toCSV inside the field config
- Add type declaration to FieldCustom to improve types
- Export with `depth: 1`
Example:
```ts
{
name: 'customRelationship',
type: 'relationship',
relationTo: 'users',
custom: {
'plugin-import-export': {
toCSV: ({ value, columnName, row, siblingDoc, doc }) => {
row[`${columnName}_id`] = value.id
row[`${columnName}_email`] = value.email
},
},
},
},
```
This clarifies that jobs.autoRun only *runs* already-queued jobs. It does not queue the jobs for you.
Also adds an e2e test as this functionality had no e2e coverage
Fixes#6871
To review this PR, use `pnpm dev lexical` and the auto-created document
in the `lexical fields` collection. Select any input within the blocks
and press `cmd+a`. The selection should contain the entire input.
I made sure that `cmd+a` still works fine inside the editor but outside
of inputs.
You can now specify exactly who can change the constraints within a
query preset.
For example, you want to ensure that only "admins" are allowed to set a
preset to "everyone".
To do this, you can use the new `queryPresets.filterConstraints`
property. When a user lacks the permission to change a constraint, the
option will either be hidden from them or disabled if it is already set.
```ts
import { buildConfig } from 'payload'
const config = buildConfig({
// ...
queryPresets: {
// ...
filterConstraints: ({ req, options }) =>
!req.user?.roles?.includes('admin')
? options.filter(
(option) =>
(typeof option === 'string' ? option : option.value) !==
'everyone',
)
: options,
},
})
```
The `filterConstraints` functions takes the same arguments as
`reduceOptions` property on select fields introduced in #12487.
Prevents an accidental lockout of query preset documents. An "accidental
lockout" occurs when the user sets access control on a preset and
excludes themselves. This can happen in a variety of scenarios,
including:
- You select `specificUsers` without specifying yourself
- You select `specificRoles` without specifying a role that you are a
part of
- Etc.
#### How it works
To make this happen, we use a custom validation function that executes
access against the user's proposed changes. If those changes happen to
remove access for them, we throw a validation error and prevent that
change from ever taking place. This means that only a user with proper
access can remove another user from the preset. You cannot remove
yourself.
To do this, we create a temporary record in the database that we can
query against. We use transactions to ensure that the temporary record
is not persisted once our work is completed. Since not all Payload
projects have transactions enabled, we flag these temporary records with
the `isTemp` field.
Once created, we query the temp document to determine its permissions.
If any of the operations throw an error, this means the user can no
longer act on them, and we throw a validation error.
#### Alternative Approach
A previous approach that was explored was to add an `owner` field to the
presets collection. This way, the "owner" of the preset would be able to
completely bypass all access control, effectively eliminating the
possibility of a lockout event.
But this doesn't work for other users who may have update access. E.g.
they could still accidentally remove themselves from the read or update
operation, preventing them from accessing that preset after submitting
the form. We need a solution that works for all users, not just the
owner.
Threads the `overrideAccess` property through the field-level
validations. This way custom `validate` functions can be aware of its
value and adjust their logic accordingly.
See #12322 for an example use case.
### What?
Extract text from the React node label in WhereBuilder
### Why?
If you have a nested field in filter options, the label would show
correctly, but the search will not work
### How
By adding an `extractTextFromReactNode` function that gets text out of
React.node label
### Code setup:
```
{
type: "collapsible",
label: "Meta",
fields: [
{
name: 'media',
type: 'relationship',
relationTo: 'media',
label: 'Ferrari',
filterOptions: () => {
return {
id: { in: ['67efdbc872ca925bc2868933'] },
}
}
},
{
name: 'media2',
type: 'relationship',
relationTo: 'media',
label: 'Williams',
filterOptions: () => {
return {
id: { in: ['67efdbc272ca925bc286891c'] },
}
}
},
],
},
```
### Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/25d4b3a2-6ac0-476b-973e-575238e916c4
### After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92346a6c-b2d1-4e08-b1e4-9ac1484f9ef3
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacob Fletcher <jacobsfletch@gmail.com>
### What?
Adds an option to open the current document in a new tab when opened in
a drawer.
### Why?
There is currently no direct way to open a document when opened in a
drawer. However, sometimes editors want to edit one or multiple
documents from relationships independently of the current edit view and
need an easy option to open these separately.
### How?
Converts the document id to a link if in drawer context.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacob Fletcher <jacobsfletch@gmail.com>
### What?
Selected documents in a relationship field can be opened in a new tab.
### Why?
Related documents can be edited using the edit icon which opens the
document in a drawer. Sometimes users would like to open the document in
a new tab instead to e.g. modify the related document at a later point
in time. This currently requires users to find the related document via
the list view and open it there. There is no easy way to find and open a
related document.
### How?
Adds custom handling to the relationship edit button to support opening
it in a new tab via middle-click, Ctrl+click, or right-click → 'Open in
new tab'.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacob Fletcher <jacobsfletch@gmail.com>
### What?
It's impossible to create a user with special characters in their email
in Payload CMS 3.35.0.
The issue is that currently the regex looks like this:
...payload/packages/payload/src/fields/validations.ts (line 202-203):
const emailRegex =
/^(?!.*\.\.)[\w.%+-]+@[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?(?:\.[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?)*\.[a-z]{2,}$/i
This allows users that have the following characters in their email to
be created:
%, ., +, -
The regex needs to get updated to the following:
const emailRegex =
/^(?!.*\.\.)[\w!#$%&'*+/=?^{|}~.-]+@a-z0-9?(?:.a-z0-9?)*.[a-z]{2,}$/i`
This way all special characters `!#$%&'*+/=?^_{|}~.-`` are hereby OK to
have in the email.
I've added more test-cases to cover a couple of more scenarios in the
forked repo.
### Why?
The regex is missing some special characters that are allowed according
to standards.
### How?
* Go to the admin ui and try to create a user with any of the newly
added special characters meaning (!#$%&'*+/=?^_{|}~.-`)
* You should get a validation error. However with the addition of the
above code it should all check out.
Fixes #
https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/issues/12180
---------
Co-authored-by: Mattias Grenhall <mattias.grenhall@assaabloy.com>
Returning a boolean value from a constraint-level access control
function does nothing. For example:
```ts
{
label: 'Noone',
value: 'noone',
access: () => false,
},
```
This is because we were only handling query objects, disregarding any
boolean values. The fix is to check if the query is a boolean, and if
so, format a query object to return.
When server rendering custom components within form state, those
components receive a path that is correct at render time, but
potentially stale after manipulating array and blocks rows. This causes
the field to briefly render incorrect values while the form state
request is in flight.
The reason for this is that paths are passed as a prop statically into
those components. Then when we manipulate rows, form state is modified,
potentially changing field paths. The component's `path` prop, however,
hasn't changed. This means it temporarily points to the wrong field in
form state, rendering the data of another row until the server responds
with a freshly rendered component.
This is not an issue with default Payload fields as they are rendered on
the client and can be passed dynamic props.
This is only an issue within custom server components, including rich
text fields which are treated as custom components. Since they are
rendered on the server and passed to the client, props are inaccessible
after render.
The fix for this is to provide paths dynamically through context. This
way as we make changes to form state, there is a mechanism in which
server components can receive the updated path without waiting on its
props to update.
### What?
This PR adds the ability to use the ListDrawer component for selecting
related collections for the relationship field instead of the default
drop down interface. This exposes the advanced filtering options that
the list view provides and provides a good interface for searching for
the correct relationship when the workflows may be more complicated.
I've added an additional "selectionType" prop to the relationship field
admin config that defaults to "dropdown" for compatability with the
existing implementation but "drawer" can be passed in as well which
enables using the ListDrawer for selecting related components.
### Why?
Adding the ability to search through the list view enables advanced
workflows or handles edge cases when just using the useAsTitle may not
be informative enough to find the related record that the user wants.
For example, if we have a collection of oscars nominations and are
trying to relate the nomination to the person who recieved the
nomination there may be multiple actors with the same name (Michelle
Williams, for example:
[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931329/](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931329/),
[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931332/](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0931332/)).
It would be hard to search through the current dropdown ui to choose the
correct person, but in the list view the user could use other fields to
identify the correct person such as an imdb id, description, or anything
else they have in the collection for that person. Other advanced
workflows could be if there are multiple versions of a record in a
collection and the user wants to select the most recent one or just
anything where the user needs to see more details about the record that
they are setting up the relationship to.
### How?
This implementation just re-uses the useListDrawer hook and the
ListDrawer component so the code changes are pretty minimal. The main
change is a new onListSelect handler that gets passed into the
ListDrawer and handles updating the value in the field when a record is
selected in the ListDrawer.
There were also a two things that I didn't implement as they would
require broader code changes 1) Bulk select from the ListDrawer when a
relationship is hasMany - when using bulkSelect in the list drawer the
relatedCollection doesn't get returned so this doesn't work for
polymorphic relationships. Updating this would involve changing the
useListDrawer hook 2) Hide values that are already selected from the
ListDrawer - potentially possible by modifying the filterOptions and
passing in an additional filter but honestly it may not be desired
behaviour to hide values from the ListDrawer as this could be confusing
for the user if they don't see records that they are expected to see
(maybe if anything make them unselectable and indicate that they are
disabled). Currently if an already selected value gets selected the
selected value gets replaced by the new value
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fee164da-4270-4612-9304-73ccf34ccf69
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacob Fletcher <jacobsfletch@gmail.com>
Fixes form state race conditions. Modifying state while a request is in
flight or while the response is being processed could result in those
changes being overridden.
This was happening for a few reasons:
1. Our merge logic was incorrect. We were disregarding local changes to
state that may have occurred while form state requests are pending. This
was because we were iterating over local state, then while building up
new state, we were ignoring any fields that did not exist in the server
response, like this:
```ts
for (const [path, newFieldState] of Object.entries(existingState)) {
if (!incomingState[path]) {
continue
}
// ...
}
```
To fix this, we need to use local state as the source of truth. Then
when the server state arrives, we need to iterate over _that_. If a
field matches in local state, merge in any new properties. This will
ensure all changes to the underlying state are preserved, including any
potential addition or deletions.
However, this logic breaks down if the server might have created _new_
fields, like when populating array rows. This means they, too, would be
ignored. To get around this, there is a new `addedByServer` property
that flags new fields to ensure they are kept.
This new merge strategy also saves an additional loop over form state.
1. We were merging form state based on a mutable ref. This meant that
changes made within one action cause concurrent actions to have dirty
reads. The fix for this is to merge in an isolated manner by copying
state. This will remove any object references. It is generally not good
practice to mutate state without setting it, anyways, as this causes
mismatches between what is rendered and what is in memory.
1. We were merging server form state directly within an effect, then
replacing state entirely. This meant that if another action took place
at the exact moment in time _after_ merge but _before_ dispatch, the
results of that other action would be completely overridden. The fix for
this is to perform the merge within the reducer itself. This will ensure
that we are working with a trustworthy snapshot of state at the exact
moment in time that the action was invoked, and that React can properly
queue the event within its lifecycle.
Significantly optimizes the component rendering strategy within the form
state endpoint by precisely rendering only the fields that require it.
This cuts down on server processing and network response sizes when
invoking form state requests **that manipulate array and block rows
which contain server components**, such as rich text fields, custom row
labels, etc. (results listed below).
Here's a breakdown of the issue:
Previously, when manipulating array and block fields, _all_ rows would
render any server components that might exist within them, including
rich text fields. This means that subsequent changes to these fields
would potentially _re-render_ those same components even if they don't
require it.
For example, if you have an array field with a rich text field within
it, adding the first row would cause the rich text field to render,
which is expected. However, when you add a second row, the rich text
field within the first row would render again unnecessarily along with
the new row.
This is especially noticeable for fields with many rows, where every
single row processes its server components and returns RSC data. And
this does not only affect nested rich text fields, but any custom
component defined on the field level, as these are handled in the same
way.
The reason this was necessary in the first place was to ensure that the
server components receive the proper data when they are rendered, such
as the row index and the row's data. Changing one of these rows could
cause the server component to receive the wrong data if it was not
freshly rendered.
While this is still a requirement that rows receive up-to-date props, it
is no longer necessary to render everything.
Here's a breakdown of the actual fix:
This change ensures that only the fields that are actually being
manipulated will be rendered, rather than all rows. The existing rows
will remain in memory on the client, while the newly rendered components
will return from the server. For example, if you add a new row to an
array field, only the new row will render its server components.
To do this, we send the path of the field that is being manipulated to
the server. The server can then use this path to determine for itself
which fields have already been rendered and which ones need required
rendering.
## Results
The following results were gathered by booting up the `form-state` test
suite and seeding 100 array rows, each containing a rich text field. To
invoke a form state request, we navigate to a document within the
"posts" collection, then add a new array row to the list. The result is
then saved to the file system for comparison.
| Test Suite | Collection | Number of Rows | Before | After | Percentage
Change |
|------|------|---------|--------|--------|--------|
| `form-state` | `posts` | 101 | 1.9MB / 266ms | 80KB / 70ms | ~96%
smaller / ~75% faster |
---------
Co-authored-by: James <james@trbl.design>
Co-authored-by: Alessio Gravili <alessio@gravili.de>
Continuation of #11867. When rendering custom fields nested within
arrays or blocks, such as the Lexical rich text editor which is treated
as a custom field, these fields will sometimes disappear when form state
requests are invoked sequentially. This is especially reproducible on
slow networks.
This is different from the previous PR in that this issue is caused by
adding _rows_ back-to-back, whereas the previous issue was caused when
adding a single row followed by a change to another field.
Here's a screen recording demonstrating the issue:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ecfa9ec-b747-49ed-8618-df282e64519d
The problem is that `requiresRender` is never sent in the form state
request for row 2. This is because the [task
queue](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11579) processes tasks
within a single `useEffect`. This forces React to batch the results of
these tasks into a single rendering cycle. So if request 1 sets state
that request 2 relies on, request 2 will never use that state since
they'll execute within the same lifecycle.
Here's a play-by-play of the current behavior:
1. The "add row" event is dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true`
1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is
dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
b. This adds a form state request into the queue
1. The initial form state request finishes
a. This sets `requiresRender: false` in form state
1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3b is sent with
`requiresRender: false`
a. THIS IS EXPECTED, BUT SHOULD ACTUALLY BE `true`!!
To fix this this, we need to ensure that the `requiresRender` property
is persisted into the second request instead of overridden. To do this,
we can add a new `serverPropsToIgnore` to form state which is read when
the processing results from the server. So if `requiresRender` exists in
`serverPropsToIgnore`, we do not merge it. This works because we
actually mutate form state in between requests. So request 2 can read
the results from request 1 without going through an additional rendering
cycle.
Here's a play-by-play of the fix:
1. The "add row" event is dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
b. This adds a task in the queue to mutate form state with
`requiresRender: true`
1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true`
1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is
dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state AND
`serverPropsToIgnore: [ "requiresRender" ]`
c. This adds a form state request into the queue
1. The initial form state request finishes
a. This returns `requiresRender: false` from the form state endpoint BUT
IS IGNORED
1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3c is sent with
`requiresRender: true`
When selecting query presets from the list drawer, all query presets are
available for selection, even if unrelated to the underlying collection.
When selecting one of these presets, the list view will crash with
client-side exceptions because the columns and filters that are applied
are incompatible.
The fix is to the thread `filterOptions` through the query presets
drawer. This will ensure that only related collections are shown.
Within auth-enabled collections, we inject the `password` and
`confirmPassword` fields into the field schema map. While this is fine
within the edit view where these fields are used, this breaks field
paths within the version diff view where unnamed fields are no longer
able to lookup their corresponding config. This is because the presence
of these injected fields increments the field indices by two.
A temporary fix for this is to simply inject these fields _last_ into
the schema map. This way their presence does not disrupt field path
generation. A long term fix should be implemented, however, where these
fields actually exist on the collection config itself. This way no
config mutation would be required as the sanitized config would the
single source of truth.
To do this, we'd need to ensure that these fields do not appear in any
APIs, and that they do not generate types, etc.
Query Presets allow you to save and share filters, columns, and sort
orders for your collections. This is useful for reusing common or
complex filtering patterns and column configurations across your team.
Query Presets are defined on the fly by the users of your app, rather
than being hard coded into the Payload Config.
Here's a screen recording demonstrating the general workflow as it
relates to the list view. Query Presets are not exclusive to the admin
panel, however, as they could be useful in a number of other contexts
and environments.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fe1155e-ae78-4f59-9138-af352762a1d5
Each Query Preset is saved as a new record in the database under the
`payload-query-presets` collection. This will effectively make them
CRUDable and allows for an endless number of preset configurations. As
you make changes to filters, columns, limit, etc. you can choose to save
them as a new record and optionally share them with others.
Normal document-level access control will determine who can read,
update, and delete these records. Payload provides a set of sensible
defaults here, such as "only me", "everyone", and "specific users", but
you can also extend your own set of access rules on top of this, such as
"by role", etc. Access control is customizable at the operation-level,
for example you can set this to "everyone" can read, but "only me" can
update.
To enable the Query Presets within a particular collection, set
`enableQueryPresets` on that collection's config.
Here's an example:
```ts
{
// ...
enableQueryPresets: true
}
```
Once enabled, a new set of controls will appear within the list view of
the admin panel. This is where you can select and manage query presets.
General settings for Query Presets are configured under the root
`queryPresets` property. This is where you can customize the labels,
apply custom access control rules, etc.
Here's an example of how you might augment the access control properties
with your own custom rule to achieve RBAC:
```ts
{
// ...
queryPresets: {
constraints: {
read: [
{
label: 'Specific Roles',
value: 'specificRoles',
fields: [roles],
access: ({ req: { user } }) => ({
'access.update.roles': {
in: [user?.roles],
},
}),
},
],
}
}
}
```
Related: #4193 and #3092
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Ribbens <dan.ribbens@gmail.com>
Since the introduction of loading states in nested fields, i.e. array
and block rows, the conditional logic tests would fail periodically
because it wouldn't wait for loading states to resolve before
continuing. This has been increasingly flaky since the introduction of
form state queues.
Consolidates all bulk edit related tests into a single, dedicated suite.
Currently, bulk edit tests are dispersed throughout the Admin > General
and the Versions test suites, which are considerably bloated for their
own purposes. This made them very hard to locate, mentally digest, and
add on new tests. Going forward, many more tests specifically for bulk
edit will need to be written. This gives us a simple, isolated place for
that.
With this change are also a few improvements to the tests themselves to
make them more predictable and efficient.
The form component's `initializing` and `processing` states do not
disable fields that are rendered outside of `DocumentFields`. Fields
currently rely on the `readOnly` prop provided by `DocumentFields` and
do not subscribe to these states for themselves. This means that fields
that are rendered outright, such as within the bulk edit drawer, they do
not receive a `readOnly` prop and are therefore never disabled.
The fix is add a `disabled` property to the `useField` hook. This
subscribes to the `initializing` and `processing` states in the same way
as `DocumentFields`, however, now each field can determine its own
disabled state instead of relying solely on the `readOnly` prop. Adding
this new prop has no overhead as `processing` and `initializing` is
already being subscribed to within `useField`.
The task queue triggers an infinite render of form state. This is
because we return an object from the `useQueues` hook that is recreated
on every render. We then use the `queueTask` function as an unstable
dependency of the `useEffect` responsible for requesting new form state,
ultimately triggering an infinite rendering loop.
The fix is to stabilize the `queueTask` function within a `useCallback`.
Adds a test to prevent future regression.
The blocks e2e tests were flaky due to how we conditionally render
fields as they enter the viewport. This prevented Playwright from every
reaching the target element when running
`locator.scrollIntoViewIfNeeded()`. This is especially flaky on pages
with many fields because the page size would continually grow as it was
scrolled.
To fix this there are new `scrollEntirePage` and `waitForPageStability`
helpers. Together, these will ensure that all fields are rendered and
fully loaded before we start testing. An early attempt at this was made
via `page.mouse.wheel(0, 1750)`, but this is an arbitrary pixel value
that is error prone and is not future proof.
These tests were also flaky by an attempt to trigger a form state action
before it was ready to receive events. The fix here is to disable any
buttons while the form is initializing and let Playwright wait for an
interactive state.
Payload now fully exposes Next.js' metadata options. You can now use the
`admin.meta` config to set any properties that Next.js supports and
Payload will inject them into its `generateMetadata` function call. The
`MetaConfig` provided by Payload now directly extends the `Metadata`
type from Next.js.
Although `admin.meta` has always been available, it only supported a
subset of options, such as `title`, `openGraph`, etc., but was lacking
properties like `robots`, etc.
Imports https://github.com/payloadcms/payload-admin-bar into the Payload
monorepo. This package will now be regularly maintained directly
alongside all Payload packages and now includes its own test suite.
A few changes minor have been made between v1.0.7 and latest:
1. The package name has changed from `payload-admin-bar` to
`@payloadcms/admin-bar`.
```diff
- import { PayloadAdminBar } from 'payload-admin-bar'
+ import { PayloadAdminBar } from '@payloadcms/admin-bar'
```
2. The `collection` prop has been renamed to `collectionSlug`
3. The `authCollection` prop has been renamed to `authCollectionSlug`
Here's a screenshot of the admin bar in use within the Website Template:
<img width="1057" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-05 at 1 20 04 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2597a8fd-da75-4b2f-8979-4fc8132999e8"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Kalon Robson <kalon.robson@outlook.com>
Adds new plugin-import-export initial version.
Allows for direct download and creation of downloadable collection data
stored to a json or csv uses the access control of the user creating the
request to make the file.
config options:
```ts
/**
* Collections to include the Import/Export controls in
* Defaults to all collections
*/
collections?: string[]
/**
* Enable to force the export to run synchronously
*/
disableJobsQueue?: boolean
/**
* This function takes the default export collection configured in the plugin and allows you to override it by modifying and returning it
* @param collection
* @returns collection
*/
overrideExportCollection?: (collection: CollectionOverride) => CollectionOverride
// payload.config.ts:
plugins: [
importExportPlugin({
collections: ['pages', 'users'],
overrideExportCollection: (collection) => {
collection.admin.group = 'System'
collection.upload.staticDir = path.resolve(dirname, 'uploads')
return collection
},
disableJobsQueue: true,
}),
],
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Jessica Chowdhury <jessica@trbl.design>
Co-authored-by: Kendell Joseph <kendelljoseph@gmail.com>
The `req.origin` property on the `PayloadRequest` object does not
include the port when running on localhost, a requirement of the [HTML
Living Standard](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#origin). This was because
we were initializing the url with a fallback of `http://localhost` (no
port). When constructed via `new URL()`, the port is unable to be
extracted. This is fixed by using the `host` property off the headers
object, if it exists, which includes the port.
Partial fix for #11448.
Maintains column state in the URL. This makes it possible to share
direct links to the list view in a specific column order or active
column state, similar to the behavior of filters. This also makes it
possible to change both the filters and columns in the same rendering
cycle, a requirement of the "list presets" feature being worked on here:
#11330.
For example:
```
?columns=%5B"title"%2C"content"%2C"-updatedAt"%2C"createdAt"%2C"id"%5D
```
The `-` prefix denotes that the column is inactive.
This strategy performs a single round trip to the server, ultimately
simplifying the table columns provider as it no longer needs to request
a newly rendered table for itself. Without this change, column state
would need to be replaced first, followed by a change to the filters.
This would make an unnecessary number of requests to the server and
briefly render the UI in a stale state.
This all happens behind an optimistic update, where the state of the
columns is immediately reflected in the UI while the request takes place
in the background.
Technically speaking, an additional database query in performed compared
to the old strategy, whereas before we'd send the data through the
request to avoid this. But this is a necessary tradeoff and doesn't have
huge performance implications. One could argue that this is actually a
good thing, as the data might have changed in the background which would
not have been reflected in the result otherwise.
When visiting a collection's list view, the nav item corresponding to
that collection correctly appears in an active state, but is still
rendered as an anchor tag. This makes it possible to reload the current
page by simply clicking the link, which is a problem because this
performs an unnecessary server roundtrip. This is especially apparent
when search params exist in the current URL, as the href on the link
does not.
Unrelated: also cleans up leftover code that was missed in this PR:
#11155
This reverts commit 69c0d09 in #11390.
In order to future proof column prefs, it probably is best to continue
to use the current shape. This change was intended to ensure that as
little transformation to URL params was made as possible for #11387, but
we will likely transform them after all.
This will ensure that we can add support for additional properties over
time, as needed. For example, if we hypothetically wanted to add a
custom `label` or similar feature to columns prefs, it would make more
sense to use explicit properties to identity `accessor` and `active`.
For example:
```ts
[
{
accessor: "title",
active: true,
label: 'Custom Label' // hypothetical
}
]
```
Transforms how column prefs are stored in the database. This change
reduces the complexity of the `columns` property by removing the
unnecessary `accessor` and `active` keys.
This change is necessary in order to [maintain column state in the
URL](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11387), where the state
itself needs to be as concise as possible. Does so in a non-breaking
way, where the old column shape is transformed as needed.
Here's an example:
Before:
```ts
[
{
accessor: "title",
active: true
}
]
```
After:
```ts
[
{
title: true
}
]
```
Continuation of #11008. When `filterOptions` are set on a relationship
field that is _nested within another field_, those filter options are
not applied to `Filter` component in the list view. This is because we
were only shallowly resolving filter options on top-level fields, as
opposed to recursively traversing fields to resolve them even when
deeply nested.
Removes unnecessary callback args from the `onConfirm` callback in the
new `ConfirmationModal` component. Now, the component will close and
reset `isConfirming` state for itself.
There are nearly a dozen independent implementations of the same modal
spread throughout the admin panel and various plugins. These modals are
used to confirm or cancel an action, such as deleting a document, bulk
publishing, etc. Each of these instances is nearly identical, leading to
unnecessary development efforts when creating them, inconsistent UI, and
duplicative stylesheets.
Everything is now standardized behind a new `ConfirmationModal`
component. This modal comes with a standard API that is flexible enough
to replace nearly every instance. This component has also been exported
for reuse.
Here is a basic example of how to use it:
```tsx
'use client'
import { ConfirmationModal, useModal } from '@payloadcms/ui'
import React, { Fragment } from 'react'
const modalSlug = 'my-confirmation-modal'
export function MyComponent() {
const { openModal } = useModal()
return (
<Fragment>
<button
onClick={() => {
openModal(modalSlug)
}}
type="button"
>
Do something
</button>
<ConfirmationModal
heading="Are you sure?"
body="Confirm or cancel before proceeding."
modalSlug={modalSlug}
onConfirm={({ closeConfirmationModal, setConfirming }) => {
// do something
setConfirming(false)
closeConfirmationModal()
}}
/>
</Fragment>
)
}
```
Similar to the goals of #11026. Adds helper utilities to make
interacting with the blocks field easier within e2e tests. This will
also standardize common functionality across tests and reduce the
overall lines of code for each, making them easier to navigate and
digest.
The following helpers are now available:
- `openBlocksDrawer`: self-explanatory
- `addBlock`: opens the blocks drawer and selects the given block
- `reorderBlocks`: similar to `reorderColumn`, moves blocks using the
drag handle
- `removeAllBlocks`: iterates all rows of a given blocks field and
removes them
