tabshift/pocketbase
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

soft deprecated apis.RequestData(c) in favor of apis.RequestInfo(c) and updated jsvm bindings

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Gani Georgiev
2023-07-17 23:13:39 +03:00
parent 7d4017225c
commit 0110869c89
22 changed files with 3158 additions and 2990 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

30
daos/record_test.go
View File

@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
scenarios := []struct {
name string
record *models.Record
requestData *models.RequestData
requestInfo *models.RequestInfo
rule *string
expected bool
expectError bool
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as admin with nil rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
Admin: admin,
},
nil,
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as admin with non-empty rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
Admin: admin,
},
types.Pointer("id = ''"), // the filter rule should be ignored
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as admin with invalid rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
Admin: admin,
},
types.Pointer("id ?!@ 1"), // the filter rule should be ignored
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as guest with nil rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{},
&models.RequestInfo{},
nil,
false,
false,
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as guest with empty rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{},
&models.RequestInfo{},
types.Pointer(""),
true,
false,
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as guest with invalid rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{},
&models.RequestInfo{},
types.Pointer("id ?!@ 1"),
false,
true,
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as guest with mismatched rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{},
&models.RequestInfo{},
types.Pointer("@request.auth.id != ''"),
false,
false,
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as guest with matched rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
Data: map[string]any{"test": 1},
},
types.Pointer("@request.auth.id != '' || @request.data.test = 1"),
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as auth record with nil rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
AuthRecord: authRecord,
},
nil,
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as auth record with empty rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
AuthRecord: authRecord,
},
types.Pointer(""),
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as auth record with invalid rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
AuthRecord: authRecord,
},
types.Pointer("id ?!@ 1"),
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as auth record with mismatched rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
AuthRecord: authRecord,
Data: map[string]any{"test": 1},
},
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
{
"as auth record with matched rule",
record,
&models.RequestData{
&models.RequestInfo{
AuthRecord: authRecord,
Data: map[string]any{"test": 2},
},
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ func TestCanAccessRecord(t *testing.T) {
}
for _, s := range scenarios {
result, err := app.Dao().CanAccessRecord(s.record, s.requestData, s.rule)
result, err := app.Dao().CanAccessRecord(s.record, s.requestInfo, s.rule)
if result != s.expected {
t.Errorf("[%s] Expected %v, got %v", s.name, s.expected, result)