Follow up to #11375.
When setting `filterOptions` on relationship or upload fields _that are
nested within a named field_, those options won't be applied to the
`Filter` component in the list view.
This is because of how we key the results when resolving `filterOptions`
on the server. Instead of using the field path as expected, we were
using the field name, causing a failed lookup on the front-end. This
also solves an issue where two fields with the same name would override
each other's `filterOptions`, since field names alone are not unique.
Unrelated: this PR also does some general housekeeping to e2e test
helpers.
---
- To see the specific tasks where the Asana app for GitHub is being
used, see below:
- https://app.asana.com/0/0/1211332845301583
Adds various helpers to make it easier and more standard to manage array
fields within e2e tests. Retrofits existing tests to ensure consistent
interactions across the board, and also organizes existing blocks and
relationship field helpers in the same way.
---
- To see the specific tasks where the Asana app for GitHub is being
used, see below:
- https://app.asana.com/0/0/1211094073049046
Supports grouping documents by specific fields within the list view.
For example, imagine having a "posts" collection with a "categories"
field. To report on each specific category, you'd traditionally filter
for each category, one at a time. This can be quite inefficient,
especially with large datasets.
Now, you can interact with all categories simultaneously, grouped by
distinct values.
Here is a simple demonstration:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0dcd19d2-e983-47e6-9ea2-cfdd2424d8b5
Enable on any collection by setting the `admin.groupBy` property:
```ts
import type { CollectionConfig } from 'payload'
const MyCollection: CollectionConfig = {
// ...
admin: {
groupBy: true
}
}
```
This is currently marked as beta to gather feedback while we reach full
stability, and to leave room for API changes and other modifications.
Use at your own risk.
Note: when using `groupBy`, bulk editing is done group-by-group. In the
future we may support cross-group bulk editing.
Dependent on #13102 (merged).
---
- To see the specific tasks where the Asana app for GitHub is being
used, see below:
- https://app.asana.com/0/0/1210774523852467
---------
Co-authored-by: Paul Popus <paul@payloadcms.com>
https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/12861 introduced some flaky
test selectors. Specifically bulk editing values and then looking for
the previous values in the table rows.
This PR fixes the flakes and fixes eslint errors in `findTableRow` and
`findTableCell` helper funcitons.
I think it's easier to review this PR commit by commit, so I'll explain
it this way:
## Commits
1. [parallelize eslint script (still showing logs results in
serial)](c9ac49c12d):
Previously, `--concurrency 1` was added to the script to make the logs
more readable. However, turborepo has an option specifically for these
use cases: `--log-order=grouped` runs the tasks in parallel but outputs
them serially. As a result, the lint script is now significantly faster.
2. [run pnpm
lint:fix](9c128c276a)
The auto-fix was run, which resolved some eslint errors that were
slipped in due to the use of `no-verify`. Most of these were
`perfectionist` fixes (property ordering) and the removal of unnecessary
assertions. Starting with this PR, this won't happen again in the
future, as we'll be verifying the linter in every PR across the entire
codebase (see commit 7).
3. [fix eslint non-autofixable
errors](700f412a33)
All manual errors have been resolved except for the configuration errors
addressed in commit 5. Most were React compiler violations, which have
been disabled and commented out "TODO" for now. There's also an unused
`use no memo` and a couple of `require` errors.
4. [move react-compiler linter to eslint-config
package](4f7cb4d63a)
To simplify the eslint configuration. My concern was that there would be
a performance regression when used in non-react related packages, but
none was experienced. This is probably because it only runs on .tsx
files.
5. [remove redundant eslint config files and fix
allowDefaultProject](a94347995a)
The main feature introduced by `typescript-eslint` v8 was
`projectService`, which automatically searches each file for the closest
`tsconfig`, greatly simplifying configuration in monorepos
([source](https://typescript-eslint.io/blog/announcing-typescript-eslint-v8#project-service)).
Once I moved `projectService` to `packages/eslint-config`, all the other
configuration files could be easily removed.
I confirmed that pnpm lint still works on individual packages.
The other important change was that the pending eslint errors from
commits 2 and 3 were resolved. That is, some files were giving the
error: "[File] was not found by the project service. Consider either
including it in the tsconfig.json or including it in
allowDefaultProject." Below I copy the explanatory comment I left in the
code:
```ts
// This is necessary because `tsconfig.base.json` defines `"rootDir": "${configDir}/src"`,
// And the following files aren't in src because they aren't transpiled.
// This is typescript-eslint's way of adding files that aren't included in tsconfig.
// See: https://typescript-eslint.io/troubleshooting/typed-linting/#i-get-errors-telling-me--was-not-found-by-the-project-service-consider-either-including-it-in-the-tsconfigjson-or-including-it-in-allowdefaultproject
// The best practice is to have a tsconfig.json that covers ALL files and is used for
// typechecking (with noEmit), and a `tsconfig.build.json` that is used for the build
// (or alternatively, swc, tsup or tsdown). That's what we should ideally do, in which case
// this hardcoded list wouldn't be necessary. Note that these files don't currently go
// through ts, only through eslint.
```
6. [Differentiate errors from warnings in VScode ESLint
Rules](5914d2f48d)
There's no reason to do that. If an eslint rule isn't an error, it
should be disabled or converted to a warning.
7. [Disable skip lint, and lint over the entire repo now that it's
faster](e4b28f1360)
The GitHub action linted only the files that had changed in the PR.
While this seems like a good idea, once exceptions were introduced with
[skip lint], they opened the door to propagating more and more errors.
Often, the linter was skipped, not because someone introduced new
errors, but because they were trying to avoid those that had already
crept in, sometimes accidentally introducing new ones.
On the other hand, `pnpm lint` now runs in parallel (commit 1), so it's
not that slow. Additionally, it runs in parallel with other GitHub
actions like e2e tests, which take much longer, so it can't represent a
bottleneck in CI.
8. [fix lint in next
package](4506595f91)
Small fix missing from commit 5
9. [Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into
fix-eslint](563d4909c1)
10. [add again eslint.config.js in payload
package](78f6ffcae7)
The comment in the code explains it. Basically, after the merge from
main, the payload package runs out of memory when linting, probably
because it grew in recent PRs. That package will sooner or later
collapse for our tooling, so we may have to split it. It's already too
big.
## Future Actions
- Resolve React compiler violations, as mentioned in commit 3.
- Decouple the `tsconfig` used for typechecking and build across the
entire monorepo (as explained in point 5) to ensure ts coverage even for
files that aren't transpiled (such as scripts).
- Remove the few remaining `eslint.config.js`. I had to leave the
`richtext-lexical` and `next` ones for now. They could be moved to the
root config and scoped to their packages, as we do for example with
`templates/vercel-postgres/**`. However, I couldn't get it to work, I
don't know why.
- Make eslint in the test folder usable. Not only are we not linting
`test` in CI, but now the `pnpm eslint .` command is so large that my
computer freezes. If each suite were its own package, this would be
solved, and dynamic codegen + git hooks to modify tsconfig.base.json
wouldn't be necessary
([related](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11984)).
Fixes#10019. When bulk editing subfields, such as a field within a
group, changes are not persisted to the database. Not only this, but
nested fields with the same name as another selected field are
controlled by the same input. E.g. typing into one fields changes the
value of both.
The root problem is that field paths are incorrect.
When opening the bulk edit drawer, fields are flattened into options for
the field selector. This is so that fields in a tab, for example, aren't
hidden behind their tab when bulk editing. The problem is that
`RenderFields` is not set up to receive pre-determined field paths. It
attempts to build up its own field paths, but are never correct because
`getFieldPaths` receives the wrong arguments.
The fix is to just render the top-level fields directly, bypassing
`RenderFields` altogether.
Fields with subfields will still recurse through this function, but at
the top-level, fields can be sent directly to `RenderField` (singular)
since their paths have already been already formatted in the flattening
step.
Consolidates all bulk edit related tests into a single, dedicated suite.
Currently, bulk edit tests are dispersed throughout the Admin > General
and the Versions test suites, which are considerably bloated for their
own purposes. This made them very hard to locate, mentally digest, and
add on new tests. Going forward, many more tests specifically for bulk
edit will need to be written. This gives us a simple, isolated place for
that.
With this change are also a few improvements to the tests themselves to
make them more predictable and efficient.
