eb2f7631f7
- Improves type for `jsonSchema` property of JSON field - Adds type generation of JSON field with `jsonSchema` - Adds `typescriptSchema` property to fields that allows you override default field type generation by providing a JSON schema. - Adds `typescript.schema` property in payload config, to allow for any modifications of the type schemas --------- Co-authored-by: Alessio Gravili <alessio@gravili.de>
366 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
366 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
title: Relationship Field
|
|
label: Relationship
|
|
order: 130
|
|
desc: The Relationship field provides the ability to relate documents together. Learn how to use Relationship fields, see examples and options.
|
|
keywords: relationship, fields, config, configuration, documentation, Content Management System, cms, headless, javascript, node, react, nextjs
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<Banner>
|
|
The Relationship field is one of the most powerful fields Payload features. It provides for the
|
|
ability to easily relate documents together.
|
|
</Banner>
|
|
|
|
<LightDarkImage
|
|
srcLight="https://payloadcms.com/images/docs/fields/relationship.png"
|
|
srcDark="https://payloadcms.com/images/docs/fields/relationship-dark.png"
|
|
alt="Shows a relationship field in the Payload admin panel"
|
|
caption="Admin panel screenshot of a Relationship field"
|
|
/>
|
|
|
|
**Example uses:**
|
|
|
|
- To add `Product` documents to an `Order` document
|
|
- To allow for an `Order` to feature a `placedBy` relationship to either an `Organization` or `User` collection
|
|
- To assign `Category` documents to `Post` documents
|
|
|
|
## Config
|
|
|
|
| Option | Description |
|
|
| ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| **`name`** \* | To be used as the property name when stored and retrieved from the database. [More](/docs/fields/overview#field-names) |
|
|
| **`relationTo`** \* | Provide one or many collection `slug`s to be able to assign relationships to. |
|
|
| **`filterOptions`** | A query to filter which options appear in the UI and validate against. [More](#filtering-relationship-options). |
|
|
| **`hasMany`** | Boolean when, if set to `true`, allows this field to have many relations instead of only one. |
|
|
| **`minRows`** | A number for the fewest allowed items during validation when a value is present. Used with `hasMany`. |
|
|
| **`maxRows`** | A number for the most allowed items during validation when a value is present. Used with `hasMany`. |
|
|
| **`maxDepth`** | Sets a maximum population depth for this field, regardless of the remaining depth when this field is reached. [Max Depth](/docs/getting-started/concepts#field-level-max-depth) |
|
|
| **`label`** | Text used as a field label in the Admin panel or an object with keys for each language. |
|
|
| **`unique`** | Enforce that each entry in the Collection has a unique value for this field. |
|
|
| **`validate`** | Provide a custom validation function that will be executed on both the Admin panel and the backend. [More](/docs/fields/overview#validation) |
|
|
| **`index`** | Build an [index](/docs/database/overview) for this field to produce faster queries. Set this field to `true` if your users will perform queries on this field's data often. |
|
|
| **`saveToJWT`** | If this field is top-level and nested in a config supporting [Authentication](/docs/authentication/config), include its data in the user JWT. |
|
|
| **`hooks`** | Provide field-based hooks to control logic for this field. [More](/docs/fields/overview#field-level-hooks) |
|
|
| **`access`** | Provide field-based access control to denote what users can see and do with this field's data. [More](/docs/fields/overview#field-level-access-control) |
|
|
| **`hidden`** | Restrict this field's visibility from all APIs entirely. Will still be saved to the database, but will not appear in any API or the Admin panel. |
|
|
| **`defaultValue`** | Provide data to be used for this field's default value. [More](/docs/fields/overview#default-values) |
|
|
| **`localized`** | Enable localization for this field. Requires [localization to be enabled](/docs/configuration/localization) in the Base config. |
|
|
| **`required`** | Require this field to have a value. |
|
|
| **`admin`** | Admin-specific configuration. See the [default field admin config](/docs/fields/overview#admin-config) for more details. |
|
|
| **`custom`** | Extension point for adding custom data (e.g. for plugins) |
|
|
| **`typescriptSchema`** | Override field type generation with providing a JSON schema |
|
|
|
|
_\* An asterisk denotes that a property is required._
|
|
|
|
<Banner type="success">
|
|
<strong>Tip:</strong>
|
|
<br />
|
|
The [Depth](/docs/getting-started/concepts#depth) parameter can be used to automatically populate
|
|
related documents that are returned by the API.
|
|
</Banner>
|
|
|
|
## Admin config
|
|
|
|
In addition to the default [field admin config](/docs/fields/overview#admin-config), the Relationship field type also
|
|
allows for the following admin-specific properties:
|
|
|
|
**`isSortable`**
|
|
|
|
Set to `true` if you'd like this field to be sortable within the Admin UI using drag and drop (only works when `hasMany`
|
|
is set to `true`).
|
|
|
|
**`allowCreate`**
|
|
|
|
Set to `false` if you'd like to disable the ability to create new documents from within the relationship field (hides
|
|
the "Add new" button in the admin UI).
|
|
|
|
**`sortOptions`**
|
|
|
|
The `sortOptions` property allows you to define a default sorting order for the options within a Relationship field's
|
|
dropdown. This can be particularly useful for ensuring that the most relevant options are presented first to the user.
|
|
|
|
You can specify `sortOptions` in two ways:
|
|
|
|
**As a string:**
|
|
|
|
Provide a string to define a global default sort field for all relationship field dropdowns across different
|
|
collections. You can prefix the field name with a minus symbol ("-") to sort in descending order.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
sortOptions: 'fieldName',
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This configuration will sort all relationship field dropdowns by `"fieldName"` in ascending order.
|
|
|
|
**As an object :**
|
|
|
|
Specify an object where keys are collection slugs and values are strings representing the field names to sort by. This
|
|
allows for different sorting fields for each collection's relationship dropdown.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
sortOptions: {
|
|
"pages"
|
|
:
|
|
"fieldName1",
|
|
"posts"
|
|
:
|
|
"-fieldName2",
|
|
"categories"
|
|
:
|
|
"fieldName3"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In this configuration:
|
|
|
|
- Dropdowns related to `pages` will be sorted by `"fieldName1"` in ascending order.
|
|
- Dropdowns for `posts` will use `"fieldName2"` for sorting in descending order (noted by the "-" prefix).
|
|
- Dropdowns associated with `categories` will sort based on `"fieldName3"` in ascending order.
|
|
|
|
Note: If `sortOptions` is not defined, the default sorting behavior of the Relationship field dropdown will be used.
|
|
|
|
## Filtering relationship options
|
|
|
|
Options can be dynamically limited by supplying a [query constraint](/docs/queries/overview), which will be used both
|
|
for validating input and filtering available relationships in the UI.
|
|
|
|
The `filterOptions` property can either be a `Where` query, or a function returning `true` to not filter, `false` to
|
|
prevent all, or a `Where` query. When using a function, it will be
|
|
called with an argument object with the following properties:
|
|
|
|
| Property | Description |
|
|
| ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
| `relationTo` | The collection `slug` to filter against, limited to this field's `relationTo` property |
|
|
| `data` | An object containing the full collection or global document currently being edited |
|
|
| `siblingData` | An object containing document data that is scoped to only fields within the same parent of this field |
|
|
| `id` | The `id` of the current document being edited. `id` is `undefined` during the `create` operation |
|
|
| `user` | An object containing the currently authenticated user |
|
|
|
|
## Example
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
import { CollectionConfig } from 'payload/types'
|
|
|
|
export const ExampleCollection: CollectionConfig = {
|
|
slug: 'example-collection',
|
|
fields: [
|
|
{
|
|
name: 'purchase',
|
|
type: 'relationship',
|
|
relationTo: ['products', 'services'],
|
|
filterOptions: ({ relationTo, siblingData }) => {
|
|
// returns a Where query dynamically by the type of relationship
|
|
if (relationTo === 'products') {
|
|
return {
|
|
stock: { greater_than: siblingData.quantity },
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (relationTo === 'services') {
|
|
return {
|
|
isAvailable: { equals: true },
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
You can learn more about writing queries [here](/docs/queries/overview).
|
|
|
|
<Banner type="warning">
|
|
<strong>Note:</strong>
|
|
<br />
|
|
When a relationship field has both <strong>filterOptions</strong> and a custom{' '}
|
|
<strong>validate</strong> function, the api will not validate <strong>filterOptions</strong>{' '}
|
|
unless you call the default relationship field validation function imported from{' '}
|
|
<strong>payload/fields/validations</strong> in your validate function.
|
|
</Banner>
|
|
|
|
## How the data is saved
|
|
|
|
Given the variety of options possible within the `relationship` field type, the shape of the data needed for creating
|
|
and updating these fields can vary. The following sections will describe the variety of data shapes that can arise from
|
|
this field.
|
|
|
|
### Has One
|
|
|
|
The most simple pattern of a relationship is to use `hasMany: false` with a `relationTo` that allows for only one type
|
|
of collection.
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
{
|
|
slug: 'example-collection',
|
|
fields
|
|
:
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
name: 'owner', // required
|
|
type: 'relationship', // required
|
|
relationTo: 'users', // required
|
|
hasMany: false,
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The shape of the data to save for a document with the field configured this way would be:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
// ObjectID of the related user
|
|
"owner": "6031ac9e1289176380734024"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
When querying documents in this collection via REST API, you could query as follows:
|
|
|
|
`?where[owner][equals]=6031ac9e1289176380734024`.
|
|
|
|
### Has One - Polymorphic
|
|
|
|
Also known as **dynamic references**, in this configuration, the `relationTo` field is an array of Collection slugs that
|
|
tells Payload which Collections are valid to reference.
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
{
|
|
slug: 'example-collection',
|
|
fields
|
|
:
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
name: 'owner', // required
|
|
type: 'relationship', // required
|
|
relationTo: ['users', 'organizations'], // required
|
|
hasMany: false,
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The shape of the data to save for a document with more than one relationship type would be:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"owner": {
|
|
"relationTo": "organizations",
|
|
"value": "6031ac9e1289176380734024"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Here is an example for how to query documents by this data (note the difference in referencing the `owner.value`):
|
|
|
|
`?where[owner.value][equals]=6031ac9e1289176380734024`.
|
|
|
|
You can also query for documents where a field has a relationship to a specific Collection:
|
|
|
|
`?where[owners.relationTo][equals]=organizations`.
|
|
|
|
This query would return only documents that have an owner relationship to organizations.
|
|
|
|
### Has Many
|
|
|
|
The `hasMany` tells Payload that there may be more than one collection saved to the field.
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
{
|
|
slug: 'example-collection',
|
|
fields
|
|
:
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
name: 'owners', // required
|
|
type: 'relationship', // required
|
|
relationTo: 'users', // required
|
|
hasMany: true,
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To save the to `hasMany` relationship field we need to send an array of IDs:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"owners": ["6031ac9e1289176380734024", "602c3c327b811235943ee12b"]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
When querying documents, the format does not change for arrays:
|
|
|
|
`?where[owners][equals]=6031ac9e1289176380734024`.
|
|
|
|
### Has Many - Polymorphic
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
{
|
|
slug: 'example-collection',
|
|
fields
|
|
:
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
name: 'owners', // required
|
|
type: 'relationship', // required
|
|
relationTo: ['users', 'organizations'], // required
|
|
hasMany: true,
|
|
required: true,
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Relationship fields with `hasMany` set to more than one kind of collections save their data as an array of objects—each
|
|
containing the Collection `slug` as the `relationTo` value, and the related document `id` for the `value`:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"owners": [
|
|
{
|
|
"relationTo": "users",
|
|
"value": "6031ac9e1289176380734024"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"relationTo": "organizations",
|
|
"value": "602c3c327b811235943ee12b"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Querying is done in the same way as the earlier Polymorphic example:
|
|
|
|
`?where[owners.value][equals]=6031ac9e1289176380734024`.
|
|
|
|
### Querying and Filtering Polymorphic Relationships
|
|
|
|
Polymorphic and non-polymorphic relationships must be queried differently because of how the related data is stored and
|
|
may be inconsistent across different collections. Because of this, filtering polymorphic relationship fields from the
|
|
Collection List admin UI is limited to the `id` value.
|
|
|
|
For a polymorphic relationship, the response will always be an array of objects. Each object will contain
|
|
the `relationTo` and `value` properties.
|
|
|
|
The data can be queried by the related document ID:
|
|
|
|
`?where[field.value][equals]=6031ac9e1289176380734024`.
|
|
|
|
Or by the related document Collection slug:
|
|
|
|
`?where[field.relationTo][equals]=your-collection-slug`.
|
|
|
|
However, you **cannot** query on any field values within the related document.
|
|
Since we are referencing multiple collections, the field you are querying on may not exist and break the query.
|
|
|
|
<Banner type="warning">
|
|
<strong>Note:</strong>
|
|
<br />
|
|
You <strong>cannot</strong> query on a field within a polymorphic relationship as you would with a
|
|
non-polymorphic relationship.
|
|
</Banner>
|