91c22bd88c02fd21ed008ea65380700661eeda21
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
e87521a376 |
perf(ui): significantly optimize form state component rendering, up to 96% smaller and 75% faster (#11946)
Significantly optimizes the component rendering strategy within the form state endpoint by precisely rendering only the fields that require it. This cuts down on server processing and network response sizes when invoking form state requests **that manipulate array and block rows which contain server components**, such as rich text fields, custom row labels, etc. (results listed below). Here's a breakdown of the issue: Previously, when manipulating array and block fields, _all_ rows would render any server components that might exist within them, including rich text fields. This means that subsequent changes to these fields would potentially _re-render_ those same components even if they don't require it. For example, if you have an array field with a rich text field within it, adding the first row would cause the rich text field to render, which is expected. However, when you add a second row, the rich text field within the first row would render again unnecessarily along with the new row. This is especially noticeable for fields with many rows, where every single row processes its server components and returns RSC data. And this does not only affect nested rich text fields, but any custom component defined on the field level, as these are handled in the same way. The reason this was necessary in the first place was to ensure that the server components receive the proper data when they are rendered, such as the row index and the row's data. Changing one of these rows could cause the server component to receive the wrong data if it was not freshly rendered. While this is still a requirement that rows receive up-to-date props, it is no longer necessary to render everything. Here's a breakdown of the actual fix: This change ensures that only the fields that are actually being manipulated will be rendered, rather than all rows. The existing rows will remain in memory on the client, while the newly rendered components will return from the server. For example, if you add a new row to an array field, only the new row will render its server components. To do this, we send the path of the field that is being manipulated to the server. The server can then use this path to determine for itself which fields have already been rendered and which ones need required rendering. ## Results The following results were gathered by booting up the `form-state` test suite and seeding 100 array rows, each containing a rich text field. To invoke a form state request, we navigate to a document within the "posts" collection, then add a new array row to the list. The result is then saved to the file system for comparison. | Test Suite | Collection | Number of Rows | Before | After | Percentage Change | |------|------|---------|--------|--------|--------| | `form-state` | `posts` | 101 | 1.9MB / 266ms | 80KB / 70ms | ~96% smaller / ~75% faster | --------- Co-authored-by: James <james@trbl.design> Co-authored-by: Alessio Gravili <alessio@gravili.de> |
||
|
|
373f6d1032 |
fix(ui): nested fields disappear when manipulating rows in form state (#11906)
Continuation of #11867. When rendering custom fields nested within arrays or blocks, such as the Lexical rich text editor which is treated as a custom field, these fields will sometimes disappear when form state requests are invoked sequentially. This is especially reproducible on slow networks. This is different from the previous PR in that this issue is caused by adding _rows_ back-to-back, whereas the previous issue was caused when adding a single row followed by a change to another field. Here's a screen recording demonstrating the issue: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ecfa9ec-b747-49ed-8618-df282e64519d The problem is that `requiresRender` is never sent in the form state request for row 2. This is because the [task queue](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11579) processes tasks within a single `useEffect`. This forces React to batch the results of these tasks into a single rendering cycle. So if request 1 sets state that request 2 relies on, request 2 will never use that state since they'll execute within the same lifecycle. Here's a play-by-play of the current behavior: 1. The "add row" event is dispatched a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state 1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true` 1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is dispatched a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state b. This adds a form state request into the queue 1. The initial form state request finishes a. This sets `requiresRender: false` in form state 1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3b is sent with `requiresRender: false` a. THIS IS EXPECTED, BUT SHOULD ACTUALLY BE `true`!! To fix this this, we need to ensure that the `requiresRender` property is persisted into the second request instead of overridden. To do this, we can add a new `serverPropsToIgnore` to form state which is read when the processing results from the server. So if `requiresRender` exists in `serverPropsToIgnore`, we do not merge it. This works because we actually mutate form state in between requests. So request 2 can read the results from request 1 without going through an additional rendering cycle. Here's a play-by-play of the fix: 1. The "add row" event is dispatched a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state b. This adds a task in the queue to mutate form state with `requiresRender: true` 1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true` 1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is dispatched a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state AND `serverPropsToIgnore: [ "requiresRender" ]` c. This adds a form state request into the queue 1. The initial form state request finishes a. This returns `requiresRender: false` from the form state endpoint BUT IS IGNORED 1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3c is sent with `requiresRender: true` |