Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jacob Fletcher
e87521a376 perf(ui): significantly optimize form state component rendering, up to 96% smaller and 75% faster (#11946)
Significantly optimizes the component rendering strategy within the form
state endpoint by precisely rendering only the fields that require it.
This cuts down on server processing and network response sizes when
invoking form state requests **that manipulate array and block rows
which contain server components**, such as rich text fields, custom row
labels, etc. (results listed below).

Here's a breakdown of the issue:

Previously, when manipulating array and block fields, _all_ rows would
render any server components that might exist within them, including
rich text fields. This means that subsequent changes to these fields
would potentially _re-render_ those same components even if they don't
require it.

For example, if you have an array field with a rich text field within
it, adding the first row would cause the rich text field to render,
which is expected. However, when you add a second row, the rich text
field within the first row would render again unnecessarily along with
the new row.

This is especially noticeable for fields with many rows, where every
single row processes its server components and returns RSC data. And
this does not only affect nested rich text fields, but any custom
component defined on the field level, as these are handled in the same
way.

The reason this was necessary in the first place was to ensure that the
server components receive the proper data when they are rendered, such
as the row index and the row's data. Changing one of these rows could
cause the server component to receive the wrong data if it was not
freshly rendered.

While this is still a requirement that rows receive up-to-date props, it
is no longer necessary to render everything.

Here's a breakdown of the actual fix:

This change ensures that only the fields that are actually being
manipulated will be rendered, rather than all rows. The existing rows
will remain in memory on the client, while the newly rendered components
will return from the server. For example, if you add a new row to an
array field, only the new row will render its server components.

To do this, we send the path of the field that is being manipulated to
the server. The server can then use this path to determine for itself
which fields have already been rendered and which ones need required
rendering.

## Results

The following results were gathered by booting up the `form-state` test
suite and seeding 100 array rows, each containing a rich text field. To
invoke a form state request, we navigate to a document within the
"posts" collection, then add a new array row to the list. The result is
then saved to the file system for comparison.

| Test Suite | Collection | Number of Rows | Before | After | Percentage
Change |
|------|------|---------|--------|--------|--------|
| `form-state` | `posts` | 101 | 1.9MB / 266ms | 80KB / 70ms | ~96%
smaller / ~75% faster |

---------

Co-authored-by: James <james@trbl.design>
Co-authored-by: Alessio Gravili <alessio@gravili.de>
2025-04-03 12:27:14 -04:00
Jacob Fletcher
373f6d1032 fix(ui): nested fields disappear when manipulating rows in form state (#11906)
Continuation of #11867. When rendering custom fields nested within
arrays or blocks, such as the Lexical rich text editor which is treated
as a custom field, these fields will sometimes disappear when form state
requests are invoked sequentially. This is especially reproducible on
slow networks.

This is different from the previous PR in that this issue is caused by
adding _rows_ back-to-back, whereas the previous issue was caused when
adding a single row followed by a change to another field.

Here's a screen recording demonstrating the issue:


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ecfa9ec-b747-49ed-8618-df282e64519d

The problem is that `requiresRender` is never sent in the form state
request for row 2. This is because the [task
queue](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11579) processes tasks
within a single `useEffect`. This forces React to batch the results of
these tasks into a single rendering cycle. So if request 1 sets state
that request 2 relies on, request 2 will never use that state since
they'll execute within the same lifecycle.

Here's a play-by-play of the current behavior:

1. The "add row" event is dispatched
    a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true`
1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is
dispatched
    a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
    b. This adds a form state request into the queue
1. The initial form state request finishes
    a. This sets `requiresRender: false` in form state
1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3b is sent with
`requiresRender: false`
    a. THIS IS EXPECTED, BUT SHOULD ACTUALLY BE `true`!!

To fix this this, we need to ensure that the `requiresRender` property
is persisted into the second request instead of overridden. To do this,
we can add a new `serverPropsToIgnore` to form state which is read when
the processing results from the server. So if `requiresRender` exists in
`serverPropsToIgnore`, we do not merge it. This works because we
actually mutate form state in between requests. So request 2 can read
the results from request 1 without going through an additional rendering
cycle.

Here's a play-by-play of the fix:

1. The "add row" event is dispatched
    a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state
b. This adds a task in the queue to mutate form state with
`requiresRender: true`
1. A form state request is sent with `requiresRender: true`
1. While that request is processing, another "add row" event is
dispatched
a. This sets `requiresRender: true` in form state AND
`serverPropsToIgnore: [ "requiresRender" ]`
    c. This adds a form state request into the queue
1. The initial form state request finishes
a. This returns `requiresRender: false` from the form state endpoint BUT
IS IGNORED
1. The next form state request that was queued up in 3c is sent with
`requiresRender: true`
2025-04-01 09:54:22 -04:00
Jacob Fletcher
10ac9893ad fix(ui): nested custom components sometimes disappear when queued in form state (#11867)
When rendering custom fields nested within arrays or blocks, such as the
Lexical rich text editor which is treated as a custom field, these
fields will sometimes disappear when form state requests are invoked
sequentially. This is especially reproducible on slow networks.

This is because form state invocations are placed into a [task
queue](https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/pull/11579) which aborts
the currently running tasks when a new one arrives. By doing this, local
form state is never dispatched, and the second task in the queue becomes
stale.

The fix is to _not_ abort the currently running task. This will trigger
a complete rendering cycle, and when the second task is invoked, local
state will be up to date.

Fixes #11340, #11425, and #11824.
2025-03-25 20:40:16 -04:00
Jacob Fletcher
0b1a1b585b fix(ui): processing and initializing form does not disable standalone fields (#11714)
The form component's `initializing` and `processing` states do not
disable fields that are rendered outside of `DocumentFields`. Fields
currently rely on the `readOnly` prop provided by `DocumentFields` and
do not subscribe to these states for themselves. This means that fields
that are rendered outright, such as within the bulk edit drawer, they do
not receive a `readOnly` prop and are therefore never disabled.

The fix is add a `disabled` property to the `useField` hook. This
subscribes to the `initializing` and `processing` states in the same way
as `DocumentFields`, however, now each field can determine its own
disabled state instead of relying solely on the `readOnly` prop. Adding
this new prop has no overhead as `processing` and `initializing` is
already being subscribed to within `useField`.
2025-03-17 10:27:21 -04:00
Jacob Fletcher
9ea8a7acf0 feat: form state select (#11689)
Implements a select-like API into the form state endpoint. This follows
the same spec as the Select API on existing Payload operations, but
works on form state rather than at the db level. This means you can send
the `select` argument through the form state handler, and it will only
process and return the fields you've explicitly identified.

This is especially useful when you only need to generate a partial form
state, for example within the bulk edit form where you select only a
subset of fields to edit. There is no need to iterate all fields of the
schema, generate default values for each, and return them all through
the network. This will also simplify and reduce the amount of
client-side processing required, where we longer need to strip
unselected fields before submission.
2025-03-14 13:11:12 -04:00
Jacob Fletcher
b81358ce7e fix(ui): form state infinite render (#11665)
The task queue triggers an infinite render of form state. This is
because we return an object from the `useQueues` hook that is recreated
on every render. We then use the `queueTask` function as an unstable
dependency of the `useEffect` responsible for requesting new form state,
ultimately triggering an infinite rendering loop.

The fix is to stabilize the `queueTask` function within a `useCallback`.
Adds a test to prevent future regression.
2025-03-12 15:06:06 -04:00
Jacob Fletcher
ac1e3cf69e feat(ui): form state queues (#11579)
Implements a form state task queue. This will prevent onChange handlers
within the form component from processing unnecessarily often, sometimes
long after the user has stopped making changes. This leads to a
potentially huge number of network requests if those changes were made
slower than the debounce rate. This is especially noticeable on slow
networks.

Does so through a new `useQueue` hook. This hook maintains a stack of
events that need processing but only processes the final event to
arrive. Every time a new event is pushed to the stack, the currently
running process is aborted (if any), and that event becomes the next in
the queue. This results in a shocking reduction in the time it takes
between final change to form state and the final network response, from
~1.5 minutes to ~3 seconds (depending on the scenario, see below).

This likely fixes a number of existing open issues. I will link those
issues here once they are identified and verifiably fixed.

Before:

I'm typing slowly here to ensure my changes aren't debounce by the form.
There are a total of 60 characters typed, triggering 58 network requests
and taking around 1.5 minutes to complete after the final change was
made.


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/49ba0790-a8f8-4390-8421-87453ff8b650

After:

Here there are a total of 69 characters typed, triggering 11 network
requests and taking only about 3 seconds to complete after the final
change was made.


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/447f8303-0957-41bd-bb2d-9e1151ed9ec3
2025-03-10 21:25:14 -04:00